Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation
- 25 March 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 110 (15), 6229-6234
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217689110
Abstract
Triple–bottom-line outcomes from resource management and conservation, where conservation goals and equity in social outcomes are maximized while overall costs are minimized, remain a highly sought-after ideal. However, despite widespread recognition of the importance that equitable distribution of benefits or costs across society can play in conservation success, little formal theory exists for how to explicitly incorporate equity into conservation planning and prioritization. Here, we develop that theory and implement it for three very different case studies in California (United States), Raja Ampat (Indonesia), and the wider Coral Triangle region (Southeast Asia). We show that equity tends to trade off nonlinearly with the potential to achieve conservation objectives, such that similar conservation outcomes can be possible with greater equity, to a point. However, these case studies also produce a range of trade-off typologies between equity and conservation, depending on how one defines and measures social equity, including direct (linear) and no trade-off. Important gaps remain in our understanding, most notably how equity influences probability of conservation success, in turn affecting the actual ability to achieve conservation objectives. Results here provide an important foundation for moving the science and practice of conservation planning—and broader spatial planning in general—toward more consistently achieving efficient, equitable, and effective outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of zoning analyses to inform the planning of a marine protected area network in Raja Ampat, IndonesiaMarine Policy, 2013
- Food security and the Coral Triangle InitiativeMarine Policy, 2013
- Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planningMarine Policy, 2013
- Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanityNature, 2012
- Feedbacks between Conservation and Social‐Ecological SystemsConservation Biology, 2012
- Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean usesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area CoveragePLOS ONE, 2011
- Prioritizing Land and Sea Conservation Investments to Protect Coral ReefsPLOS ONE, 2010
- Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approachEcological Economics, 2009
- Using gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners: Theoretical considerations and an application based on Alberta dataSocial Science & Medicine, 1994