Maximum-likelihood phase estimation in phase-shifting electronic speckle pattern interferometry and its comparison with least-squares estimation
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- Published by Optica Publishing Group in Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Vol. 14 (5), 1051-1057
- https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.14.001051
Abstract
The least-squares phase-fitting method, developed recently without any statistical justification, extracts an almost noiseless phase directly from the distribution of the intensities of phase-shifted speckle interference patterns [C. K. Hong et al., Opt. Lett. 20, 931 (1995)]. We present another method that can do the same by using the statistically well-established maximum-likelihood algorithm. Numerical simulations show that the precision of the maximum-likelihood estimate is better than that of the least-squares method by 19% and that its precision essentially achieves the one given by the Cramér–Rao lower bound. The limitations of the two methods subject to the phase variation within a fitting window are also studied.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Least-squares fitting of the phase map obtained in phase-shifting electronic speckle pattern interferometryOptics Letters, 1995
- Eigenvector method for maximum-likelihood estimation of phase errors in synthetic-aperture-radar imageryJournal of the Optical Society of America A, 1993
- Nondestructive testing by use of TV holography and deformation phase gradient calculationApplied Optics, 1990
- Speckle processing method for synthetic-aperture-radar phase correctionOptics Letters, 1989
- Digital phase stepping speckle interferometryOptics Communications, 1986
- Electrooptic holography and its application to hologram interferometryApplied Optics, 1985
- Phase-shifting speckle interferometryApplied Optics, 1985