A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 16 July 2013
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Vol. 13 (1), 92-12
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-92
Abstract
Sensitivity analyses play a crucial role in assessing the robustness of the findings or conclusions based on primary analyses of data in clinical trials. They are a critical way to assess the impact, effect or influence of key assumptions or variations—such as different methods of analysis, definitions of outcomes, protocol deviations, missing data, and outliers—on the overall conclusions of a study. The current paper is the second in a series of tutorial-type manuscripts intended to discuss and clarify aspects related to key methodological issues in the design and analysis of clinical trials. In this paper we will provide a detailed exploration of the key aspects of sensitivity analyses including: 1) what sensitivity analyses are, why they are needed, and how often they are used in practice; 2) the different types of sensitivity analyses that one can do, with examples from the literature; 3) some frequently asked questions about sensitivity analyses; and 4) some suggestions on how to report the results of sensitivity analyses in clinical trials. When reporting on a clinical trial, we recommend including planned or posthoc sensitivity analyses, the corresponding rationale and results along with the discussion of the consequences of these analyses on the overall findings of the study.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomized placebo-controlled trial of methotrexate in psoriatic arthritisRheumatology, 2012
- Data withdrawal in randomized controlled trials: Defining the problem and proposing solutions: A commentaryContemporary Clinical Trials, 2011
- Comparing methods to estimate treatment effects on a continuous outcome in multicentre randomized controlled trials: A simulation studyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trialsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Assessing methods for dealing with treatment switching in randomised controlled trials: a simulation studyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trialsJournal of Public Health Dentistry, 2011
- Four-year follow-up of surgical versus non-surgical therapy for chronic low back painAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2009
- Estimation of average treatment effect with incompletely observed longitudinal data: Application to a smoking cessation studyStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Missing Data Analysis: Making It Work in the Real WorldAnnual Review of Psychology, 2009
- Sensitivity analysis and external adjustment for unmeasured confounders in epidemiologic database studies of therapeuticsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2006