Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction patients
- 18 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 72 (7), 927-933
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.21722
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD), in relation to single or multivessel (MV)‐PCI and to patients with single vessel disease (SVD). Methods: Patients treated with PCI in the setting of P = 0.007), new revascularization 2.9% and 9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Thirty‐day mortality was 2.4% in SVD and 6.7% in MVD (P = 0.006). After exclusion of patients with cardiogenic shock or pulmonary oedema, more frequent in the MV‐PCI in single session group (P = 0.006), 30‐day mortality was SVD 1.3%, IRA‐only 6.3%, MV‐PCI 2.8% (P = 0.023), without differences if in a single (3.3%) or in staged session (2.2%). By multivariate analysis, female sex, anterior STEMI, cardiogenic shock, MVD, and procedural failure were independent predictors of 30‐day mortality. Conclusions: STEMI patients with MVD have a worse prognosis than those with SVD. MV‐PCI in patients without hemodynamic compromise yields good short‐term results, even if performed very early, with a 30‐day mortality in between that of SVD patients and that of MVD patients with IRA‐only treatment.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Culprit only versus complete coronary revascularization during primary PCIInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2008
- Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease after ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary AngioplastyJournal of Interventional Cardiology, 2007
- Importance of complete revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary interventionAmerican Heart Journal, 2007
- In Unstable Angina or Non–ST-Segment Acute Coronary Syndrome, Should Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergo Multivessel or Culprit-Only Stenting?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- In-hospital and long-term outcomes of multivessel percutaneous coronary revascularization after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- Multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease and acute myocardial infarctionAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease: A randomized comparisonAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Single vs multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty: results of the multicentre randomised HEpacoat™ for cuLPrit or multivessel stenting for Acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP AMI) StudyInternational Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions, 2004
- The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Determinants of Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982