Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review
Open Access
- 12 February 2009
- Vol. 338 (feb12 2), b354
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b354
Abstract
Objective To explore the relation between study concordance, take home message, funding, and dissemination of comparative studies assessing the effects of influenza vaccines.Design Systematic review without meta-analysis.Data extraction Search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and the web, without language restriction, for any studies comparing the effects of influenza vaccines against placebo or no intervention. Abstraction and assessment of quality of methods were carried out.Data synthesis We identified 259 primary studies (274 datasets). Higher quality studies were significantly more likely to show concordance between data presented and conclusions (odds ratio 16.35, 95% confidence interval 4.24 to 63.04) and less likely to favour effectiveness of vaccines (0.04, 0.02 to 0.09). Government funded studies were less likely to have conclusions favouring the vaccines (0.45, 0.26 to 0.90). A higher mean journal impact factor was associated with complete or partial industry funding compared with government or private funding and no funding (differences between means 5.04). Study size was not associated with concordance, content of take home message, funding, and study quality. Higher citation index factor was associated with partial or complete industry funding. This was sensitive to the exclusion from the analysis of studies with undeclared funding.Conclusion Publication in prestigious journals is associated with partial or total industry funding, and this association is not explained by study quality or size.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mortality Reduction with Influenza Vaccine in Patients with Pneumonia Outside “Flu” SeasonAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Association Between Funding Source and Study Outcome in Orthopaedic ResearchClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2003
- Association of Funding and Conclusions in Randomized Drug TrialsJAMA, 2003
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic reviewBMJ, 2003
- Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physiciansInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2003
- Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical ResearchJAMA, 2003
- Association between competing interests and authors' conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJBMJ, 2002
- The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome in randomized controlled drug trialsFamily Practice, 2001
- Journal reading habits of internistsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2000
- Journal impact factor: a brief review.1999