Use of Causal Language in Observational Studies of Obesity and Nutrition
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Obesity Facts
- Vol. 3 (6), 353-356
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000322940
Abstract
Objective: To assesss the inappropriate use of causal language in studies on obesity and nutrition. Methods: Titles and abstracts of 525 peer-reviewed papers in the 4 leading journals in the fields of obesity and nutrition were scrutinized for language implying causality in observational studies published in 2006. Results: Such misleading language appeared in 161 papers (31%) independent of funding source. Remarkably 49% of studies lacking statistically significant primary outcomes used misleading language compared to 29% of those with p values ≤0.05 (chi square p < 0.001). Exculpatory language was present in the body of the text in 19%; of the 161 studies. Conclusion: We suggest that editors and reviewers evaluate submissions for misleading reporting.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Industry funding and the reporting quality of large long-term weight loss trialsInternational Journal of Obesity, 2008
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Relationship between Funding Source and Conclusion among Nutrition-Related Scientific ArticlesPLoS Medicine, 2007
- Industry Influence on Occupational and Environmental Public HealthInternational Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2007
- Checking the Pulse: Midwestern Reporters' Opinions on Their Ability to Report Health Care NewsAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2002