AN EVALUATION OF PREFERENCE FOR VIDEO AND IN VIVO MODELING
- 1 June 2010
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Vol. 43 (2), 279-283
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-279
Abstract
We assessed preference for video or in vivo modeling using a concurrent-chains arrangement with 3 children with autism. The two modeling conditions produced similar acquisition rates and no differential selection (i.e., preference) for all 3 participants.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- A COMPARISON OF PEER VIDEO MODELING AND SELF VIDEO MODELING TO TEACH TEXTUAL RESPONSES IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISMJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2009
- A Meta-Analysis of Video Modeling and Video Self-Modeling Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum DisordersExceptional Children, 2007
- Video Modeling Interventions for Individuals with AutismRemedial and Special Education, 2007
- ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF AND PREFERENCE FOR PUNISHMENT AND EXTINCTION COMPONENTS OF FUNCTION‐BASED INTERVENTIONSJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2005
- Video modeling: Why does it work for children with autism?Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 2005
- USING VIDEO MODELING AND REINFORCEMENT TO TEACH PERSPECTIVE‐TAKING SKILLS TO CHILDREN WITH AUTISMJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2003
- The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: A Standard Measure of Social and Communication Deficits Associated with the Spectrum of AutismJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2000
- A Comparison of Video Modeling with In Vivo Modeling for Teaching Children with AutismJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2000