Surgical Versus Prosthetic Reconstruction of Microtia: The Case for Prosthetic Reconstruction
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Vol. 64 (11), 1639-1654
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.050
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Establishment of a bone-anchored auricular prosthesis (BAAP) programInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2002
- Auricular Reconstruction for Microtia: Part II. Surgical TechniquesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2002
- Rib graft reconstruction versus osseointegrated prosthesis for microtia: a significant change in patient preference.Clinical Otolaryngology, 2001
- Auricular Reconstruction: Indications for Autogenous and Prosthetic TechniquesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2001
- The Pediatrician's Role in Caring for Patients With Congenital Microtia and AtresiaPediatric Annals, 1999
- Auricular Rehabilitation With Bone‐Anchored Titanium ImplantsThe Laryngoscope, 1999
- Ear reconstruction in cases of typical microtia. Personal experience based on 352 microtic ear correctionsScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 1998
- Chest Wall Deformities and Thoracic Scoliosis after Costal Cartilage Graft HarvestingPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997
- Osseointegrated Alloplastic versus Autogenous Ear ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1994
- Auricular Repair with Autogenous Rib Cartilage GraftsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1992