Abstract
Mice, administered haloperiodl (3 mg/kg/d) in their drinking water for 21 days, displayed, 4 days after cessation of the haloperidol-treatment, marked locomotor stimulation to clonidine (100 or 500 μg/kg) which lasted for about 6 h. 25 μg clonidine/kg was inactive. Premedication with FLA-63 (25 mg/kg) blocked the difference in stimulation after clonidine between the haloperidol- and vehicle-treated animals, but locomotor activity was still present in both groups. Haloperidol-treated animals displayed a supersensitive response to dexamphetamine. The difference in stimulation produced by dexamphetamine in the two groups was completely blocked by phenoxybenzamine (2.5 mg/kg), phentolamine (10 mg/kg), which drugs did not, however, block the locomotor stimulation produced by dexamphetamine in vehicle-treated animals. Pimozide (3 mg/kg) blocked all locomotor stimulation produced by dexamphetamine in both vehicle- and haloperidol-treated groups, while 1 mg/kg completely blocked the dexamphetamine response in vehicle-treated animals but not in haloperidol-treated animals. FLA-63 (25 mg/kg) blocked the difference in response between the haloperidol- and vehicletreated groups to dexamphetamine, but did not antagonise the stimulation in the vehicle-treated animals. The data suggest that long-term haloperidol treatment leads to the development of “supersensitive” adrenergic receptors in the central nervous system, which, appropriately stimulated, effect an increase in locomotor activity. Moreover, the results indicate that a large component of the supersensitive response to dexamphetamine observed after long-term haloperidol-treatment is due to adrenergic receptor supersensitivity. However, the dopamine receptor (which was shown to be supersensitive to apomorphine) is of fundamental importance because phenoxybenzamine and phenolamine, while blocking the supersensitive response to dexamphetamine, failed to block the response to dexamphetamine in vehicletreated animals, which was, however, blocked by pimozide.