Abstract
To understand how the separation between the electron and proton-accepting sites affects proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactivity, we have prepared ruthenium complexes with 4′-(4-carboxyphenyl)terpyridine ligands, and studied reactivity with hydrogen atom donors (H-X). RuII(pydic)(tpy-PhCOOH) (RuIIPhCOOH), was synthesized in one pot from [(p-cymene)RuCl2]2, sodium 4′-(4-carboxyphenyl)-2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine ([Na+]tpy-PhCOO), and disodium pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate (Na2pydic). RuIIPhCOOH plus nBu4NOH in DMF yields the deprotonated Ru(II) complex, nBu4N[RuII(pydic)(tpy-PhCOO)] (RuIIPhCOO). The Ru(III) complex (RuIIIPhCOO) has been isolated by one-electron oxidation of RuIIPhCOO with triarylaminium radical cations (NAr3•+). The bond dissociation free energy (BDFE) of the O−H bond in RuIIPhCOOH is calculated from pKa and E1/2 measurements as 87 kcal mol−1, making RuIIIPhCOO a strong hydrogen atom acceptor. There are 10 bonds and ca. 11.2 Å separating the metal from the carboxylate basic site in RuIIIPhCOO. Even with this separation, RuIIIPhCOO oxidizes the hydrogen atom donor TEMPOH (BDFE = 66.5 kcal mol−1, ΔG°rxn = −21 kcal mol−1) by removal of an electron and a proton to form RuIIPhCOOH and TEMPO radical in a concerted proton−electron transfer (CPET) process. The second order rate constant for this reaction is (1.1 ± 0.1) × 105 M−1 s−1 with kH/kD = 2.1 ± 0.2, similar to the observed kinetics in an analogous system without the phenyl spacer, RuIII(pydic)(tpy-COO) (RuIIICOO). In contrast, hydrogen transfer from 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-methoxyphenol [tBu2(OMe)ArOH] to RuIIIPhCOO is several orders of magnitude slower than the analogous reaction with RuIIICOO.