“Forward psychiatry” in the military: Its origins and effectiveness
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Traumatic Stress
- Vol. 16 (4), 411-419
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024426321072
Abstract
“Forward psychiatry” was devised in World War I for the treatment of shell shock and today is the standard intervention for combat stress reaction. It relied on three principles: proximity to battle, immediacy, and expectation of recovery, subsequently given the acronym “PIE”. Both US and UK forces belatedly reintroduced PIE methods during World War II to return servicemen to active duty and made confident claims for its efficacy. Advanced treatment units also appeared to have minimized psychiatric battle casualties during Korean and Vietnamese Wars. Evaluations of its use by Israeli forces in the Lebanon conflict showed higher return‐to‐duty rates than at base hospitals. A reexamination of these examples suggests that reported outcomes tended to exaggerate its effectiveness both as a treatment for acute stress reaction and as a prophylaxis for chronic disorders such as PTSD. It remains uncertain who is being served by the intervention: whether it is the individual soldier or the needs of the military.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early intervention for trauma: Current status and future directions.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2002
- The changing patterns of psychiatric problems in VietnamComprehensive Psychiatry, 1973
- COMBAT EXHAUSTIONThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1946
- PSYCHIATRIC LESSONS FROM ACTIVE SERVICEThe Lancet, 1945
- PSYCHIATRY IN MODERN WARFAREThe American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 1945
- Military Psychiatry in the Middle EastBMJ, 1944
- WAR NEUROSIS: A COMPARISON OF EARLY CASES SEEN IN THE FIELD WITH THOSE SEEN AT THE BASE.The Lancet, 1919
- The management of psycho-neuroses in the Canadian army.The Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1919
- A SERIES OF MILITARY CASES TREATED BY HYPNOTIC SUGGESTION.The Lancet, 1916
- A CONTRIBUTION TO THE ETIOLOGY OF SHELL SHOCK.The Lancet, 1916