A parallel-group, randomised controlled trial of a multimedia, self-directed, coping skills training intervention for patients with cancer and their partners: design and rationale
Open Access
- 24 July 2013
- Vol. 3 (7), e003337
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003337
Abstract
Introduction Coping skills training interventions have been found to be efficacious in helping both patients and their partners manage the physical and emotional challenges they face following a cancer diagnosis. However, many of these interventions are costly and not sustainable. To overcome these issues, a self-directed format is increasingly used. The efficacy of self-directed interventions for patients has been supported; however, no study has reported on the outcomes for their partners. This study will test the efficacy of Coping-Together—a multimedia, self-directed, coping skills training intervention for patients with cancer and their partners. Methods and analysis The proposed three-group, parallel, randomised controlled trial will recruit patients diagnosed in the past 4 months with breast, prostate, colorectal cancer or melanoma through their treating clinician. Patients and their partners will be randomised to (1) a minimal ethical care (MEC) condition—selected Cancer Council New South Wales booklets and a brochure for the Cancer Council Helpline, (2) Coping-Together generic—MEC materials, the six Coping-Together booklets and DVD, the Cancer Council Queensland relaxation audio CD and login to the Coping-Together website or (3) Coping-Together tailored—MEC materials, the Coping-Together DVD, the login to the website and only those Coping-Together booklet sections that pertain to their direct concerns. Anxiety (primary outcome), distress, depression, dyadic adjustment, quality of life, illness or caregiving appraisal, self-efficacy and dyadic and individual coping will be assessed before receiving the study material (ie, baseline) and again at 3, 6 and 12 months postbaseline. Intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis will be conducted. Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the relevant local area health and University ethics committees. Study findings will be disseminated not only through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations but also through educational outreach visits, publication of lay research summaries in consumer newsletters and publications targeting clinicians. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000491763 (03/05/2013)Keywords
This publication has 80 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physical, Psychosocial, Relationship, and Economic Burden of Caring for People With Cancer: A ReviewJournal of Oncology Practice, 2013
- Do Couple-Based Interventions Make a Difference for Couples Affected by Cancer?: A Systematic ReviewBMC Cancer, 2012
- Including all individuals is not enough: Lessons for intention-to-treat analysisClinical Trials, 2012
- A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to improve cancer caregiver quality of lifePsycho‐Oncology, 2012
- A pilot randomized controlled trial of the feasibility of a self-directed coping skills intervention for couples facing prostate cancer: Rationale and designHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2012
- Factors Associated With Prostate Cancer Patients' and Their Spouses' Satisfaction With a Family-Based InterventionCancer Nursing, 2009
- The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2008
- The burden of multiple sclerosis: A community health surveyHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2008
- You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief copeInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1997
- The Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 1983