Labellar Micromorphology of Two Euglossine-pollinated Orchid Genera; Scuticaria Lindl. and Dichaea Lindl.
Open Access
- 3 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Botany
- Vol. 102 (5), 805-824
- https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn155
Abstract
Until recently, there was no consensus regarding the phylogenetic relationships of the Neotropical orchid genera Scuticaria Lindl. and Dichaea Lindl. However, recent evidence derived from both gross morphological and molecular studies supports the inclusion of Scuticaria and Dichaea in sub-tribes Maxillariinae and Zygopetalinae, respectively. The present paper describes the labellar micromorphology of both genera and seeks to establish whether labellar characters support the assignment of Scuticaria and Dichaea to these sub-tribes. The labella of four species of Scuticaria and 14 species of Dichaea were examined using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy, and their micromorphology was compared with that of representative species of Maxillariinae sensu lato and Zygopetalinae (Huntleya clade). In most specimens of Scuticaria examined, the papillose labella bear uniseriate, multicellular, unbranched trichomes. However, in S. steelii (Lindl.) Lindl., branched hairs may also be present and some trichomes may fragment and form pseudopollen. Multicellular, leaf-like scales were also present in one species of Scuticaria. Similar, unbranched hairs are present in certain species of Maxillaria Ruiz & Pav. (Maxillariinae sensu stricto) and Chaubardia Rchb.f. (Huntleya clade). As yet, moniliform, pseudopollen-forming hairs have not been observed for Zygopetalinae, but their presence in Scuticaria steelii, Maxillaria and Heterotaxis Lindl. supports the placing of Scuticaria in Maxillariinae. As other genera are sampled, the presence of branched hairs, hitherto unknown for Maxillariinae sensu lato, may prove to be a useful character in taxonomy and phylogenetic studies. Euglossophily occurs in Dichaea, as well as Chondrorhyncha Lindl. and Pescatorea Rchb.f. (Huntleya clade), and all three genera tend to lack distinctive labellar features. Instead, lip micromorphology is relatively simple and glabrous or papillose. However, two of the Dichaea species examined bear unicellular, labellar trichomes very similar to those found in Bifrenaria Lindl. (pollinated by both euglossine bees and Bombus spp.), and this feature may have arisen by convergence in response to similar pollination pressures.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular phylogenetics of Maxillaria and related genera (Orchidaceae: Cymbidieae) based on combined molecular data setsAmerican Journal of Botany, 2007
- Labellar Micromorphology of Bifrenariinae Dressler (Orchidaceae)Annals of Botany, 2006
- Comparative molecular and morphological studies in selectedMaxillariinaeorchidsWilldenowia, 2006
- An overview of the phylogenetic relationships within Epidendroideae inferred from multiple DNA regions and recircumscription of Epidendreae and Arethuseae (Orchidaceae)American Journal of Botany, 2005
- Classification of Orchidaceae in the Age of DNA dataCurtis's Botanical Magazine, 2005
- Systematic and comparative anatomy of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae), sans OncidiinaeBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2004
- Atypical pseudopollen-forming hairs in Maxillaria (Orchidaceae)Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003
- Phylogeny of the Bifrenaria (Orchidaceae) Complex Based on Morphology and Sequence Data from Nuclear rDNA Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS) and Chloroplast trnL‐trnF RegionInternational Journal of Plant Sciences, 2002
- Ultrastructure of the labellar epidermis in selected Maxillaria species (Orchidaceae)Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 1998
- Pigment distribution, light reflection and cell structure in petalsBotanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 1981