Follow-up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 13 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 377 (2), 132-142
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1615869
Abstract
We previously found no significant differences in mortality between men who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer and those who were treated with observation only. Uncertainty persists regarding nonfatal health outcomes and long-term mortality.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- The Primary Outcome Fails — What Next?New England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Ascertaining cause of death among men in the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation TrialClinical Trials, 2013
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- The Prostate cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial:VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): Design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy to watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancerContemporary Clinical Trials, 2009
- Competing Risk Analysis of Men Aged 55 to 74 Years at Diagnosis Managed Conservatively for Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1998
- Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1998
- A Class of $K$-Sample Tests for Comparing the Cumulative Incidence of a Competing RiskThe Annals of Statistics, 1988
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987