Impact of remuneration and organizational factors on completing preventive manoeuvres in primary care practices
- 5 December 2011
- journal article
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 184 (2), E135-E143
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110407
Abstract
Background: Several jurisdictions attempting to reform primary care have focused on changes in physician remuneration. The goals of this study were to compare the delivery of preventive services by practices in four primary care funding models and to identify organizational factors associated with superior preventive care. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, we included 137 primary care practices in the province of Ontario (35 fee-for-service practices, 35 with salaried physicians [community health centres], 35 practices in the new capitation model [family health networks] and 32 practices in the established capitation model [health services organizations]). We surveyed 288 family physicians. We reviewed 4108 randomly selected patient charts and assigned prevention scores based on the proportion of eligible preventive manoeuvres delivered for each patient. Results: A total of 3284 patients were eligible for at least one of six preventive manoeuvres. After adjusting for patient profile and contextual factors, we found that, compared with prevention scores in practices in the new capitation model, scores were significantly lower in fee-for-service practices (β estimate for effect on prevention score = −6.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] −11.9 to −0.6) and practices in the established capitation model (β = −9.1, 95% CI −14.9 to −3.3) but not for those with salaried remuneration (β = −0.8, 95% CI −6.5 to 4.8). After accounting for physician characteristics and organizational structure, the type of funding model was no longer a statistically significant factor. Compared with reference practices, those with at least one female family physician (β = 8.0, 95% CI 4.2 to 11.8), a panel size of fewer than 1600 patients per full-time equivalent family physician (β = 6.8, 95% CI 3.1 to 10.6) and an electronic reminder system (β = 4.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 8.7) had superior prevention scores. The effect of these three factors was largely but not always consistent across the funding models; it was largely consistent across the preventive manoeuvres. Interpretation: No funding model was clearly associated with superior preventive care. Factors related to physician characteristics and practice structure were stronger predictors of performance. Practices with one or more female physicians, a smaller patient load and an electronic reminder system had superior prevention scores. Our findings raise questions about reform initiatives aimed at increasing patient numbers, but they support the adoption of information technology.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Doctor Behaviour under a Pay for Performance Contract: Treating, Cheating and Case Finding?The Economic Journal, 2010
- The effects of teamwork and system support on colorectal cancer screening in primary care practicesCancer Detection Prevention, 2007
- How to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in PracticeCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2007
- Barriers of and Facilitators to Physician Recommendation of Colorectal Cancer ScreeningJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice: Innovative Strategies and Future DirectionsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Views of family physicians in southwestern Ontario on preventive care services and performance incentivesFamily Practice, 2006
- Influence of Primary Care Practice and Provider Attributes on Preventive Service DeliveryAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2006
- Delivery of Clinical Preventive Services in Family Medicine OfficesAnnals of Family Medicine, 2005
- Primary care provider perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of colorectal cancer screening in a managed care settingCancer, 2004
- Physician Gender Effects on Preventive Screening and CounselingMedical Care, 2001