Three Methods to Determine Profiles of Reflectivity from Volumetric Radar Data to Correct Precipitation Estimates
Open Access
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
- Vol. 39 (10), 1715-1726
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450-39.10.1715
Abstract
The vertical variability of radar reflectivity reduces the reliability of precipitation estimation by radar, especially in complex orography. This important source of error can, at least partially, be corrected for, if the vertical profile of radar reflectivity (VPR) is known. This work addresses three ways to determine VPR from volumetric radar data for correcting precipitation estimates. The first way uses a climatological profile. The second method, operational in Switzerland, takes the actual weather conditions into account: a mean profile is estimated directly from volumetric radar data collected close to the radar. The third way determines the identified profile, taking the variability of the VPRs in space into account. This approach yields local estimates of the profile (on areas of about 20 km × 20 km) based on an inverse method. Two cases, a convective event and a stratiform event, are used to illustrate the three ways for determining the VPR, and the resulting improvement, verified with rain gauges. An enlarged dataset of nine cases shows that a correction based on a climatological profile already improves the accuracy of rain estimates by radar significantly: the fractional standard error (FSE) is reduced from the noncorrected 44% to 31%. By correcting with a single, mean profile (averaged over 1 h using real-time data), the FSE is further reduced from 31% to 25%. Last, the use of 70 locally identified profiles leads to best results (FSE = 23%). A higher improvement (lower FSE) is obtained for the stratiform rain event than for the convective case.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radar estimates of rainfall rates at the ground in bright band and non‐bright band eventsQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1998
- A Simulation Approach for Validation of a Brightband Correction MethodJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 1997
- The Application of Radar–Gauge Comparisons to Operational Precipitation Profile CorrectionsJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 1995
- Long-Term Radar Observations of the Melting Layer of Precipitation and Their InterpretationJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1995
- Identification of Vertical Profiles of Radar Reflectivity for Hydrological Applications Using an Inverse Method. Part II: FormulationJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 1995
- Identification of Vertical Profiles of Radar Reflectivity for Hydrological Applications Using an Inverse Method. Part I: FormulationJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 1995
- Radar measurement of precipitation in cold mountainous areas: the Garonne basinHydrological Sciences Journal, 1994
- Real‐time correction of weather radar data for the effects of bright band, range and orographic growth in widespread precipitationQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1994
- Precipitation Measurement and HydrologyPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1990
- Accuracy of rainfall estimates by radar, part I: Calibration by telemetering raingaugesJournal of Hydrology, 1986