Open Abdominal versus Laparoscopic and Vaginal Hysterectomy: Analysis of a Large United States Payer Measuring Quality and Cost of Care
- 1 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
- Vol. 16 (5), 581-588
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Ethicon Endo-Surgery
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Decreasing utilization of hysterectomy: a population-based study in Olmsted county, Minnesota, 1965-2002American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Hysterectomy Rates for Benign IndicationsObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditionsPublished by Wiley ,2005
- Transvaginal Hysterectomy: Rationale and Surgical ApproachObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?Journal of Health Economics, 2001
- Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Smearing Estimate: A Nonparametric Retransformation MethodJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1983