Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 209 (4), 294-306
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.043
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 131 references indexed in Scilit:
- Single‐ versus double‐layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine ruptureInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2011
- Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trialsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011
- Ampicillin/Sulbactam versus Cefuroxime as antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: a randomized studyBMC Infectious Diseases, 2010
- Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR)*BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2010
- Effects of method of uterine repair on surgical outcome of cesarean deliveryInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2010
- Rectally administered misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin infusion during cesarean delivery to reduce intraoperative and postoperative blood lossInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2010
- Sublingual misoprostol versus oxytocin infusion to reduce blood loss at cesarean sectionInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2005
- Thromboprophylaxis and pregnancy: Two randomized controlled pilot trials that used low-molecular-weight heparinAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Evaluation of combinations of procedures in cesarean sectionInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1995
- Comparative study of single layer and conventional closure of uterine incision in cesarean sectionInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1988