Recruitment Restrictions and Labor Markets: Evidence from the Postbellum U.S. South
- 1 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Journal of Labor Economics
- Vol. 28 (2), 413-445
- https://doi.org/10.1086/651512
Abstract
This article studies the effect of recruitment restrictions on mobility and wages in the postbellum U.S. South. I estimate the effects of criminal fines charged for "enticement" (recruiting workers already under contract) on sharecropper mobility, tenancy choice, and agricultural wages. I find that a $13 (10%) increase in the enticement fine lowered the probability of a move by black sharecroppers by 12%, daily wages by 1 cent (.1%), and the returns to experience for blacks by 0.6% per year. These results are consistent with an on-the-job search model, where the enticement fine raises the cost of recruiting an employed worker. (c) 2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved..Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Time on the Ladder: Career Mobility in Agriculture, 1890–1938The Journal of Economic History, 2005
- Equilibrium Wage Dispersion with Worker and Employer HeterogeneityEconometrica, 2002
- Wage Differentials, Employer Size, and UnemploymentInternational Economic Review, 1998
- Agricultural Chutes and Ladders: New Estimates of Sharecroppers and “True Tenants” in the South, 1900–1920The Journal of Economic History, 1997
- Turnover Cost and the Distribution of slave Labor in Anglo-AmericaThe Journal of Economic History, 1996
- A History of Mechanization in the Cotton South: The Institutional HypothesisThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1985
- "Bound" or "Free"? Black Labor in Cotton and Sugarcane Farming, 1865-1880The Journal of Southern History, 1984
- Labor-Tying in a Poor Agrarian Economy: A Theoretical and Empirical AnalysisThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- Economic Adjustments to Emancipation in the United States and British West IndiesJournal of Interdisciplinary History, 1982
- The Economics of DiscriminationJournal of Political Economy, 1963