Axial Loading During Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis
- 1 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Spine
- Vol. 37 (16), E985-E992
- https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31821038f2
Abstract
We compared the sizes of the dural sac among conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), axial loaded MRI, and upright myelography in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). To determine whether axial loaded MRI can demonstrate similar positional changes of the dural sac size as were detected by upright myelography in LSCS. In patients with LSCS, constriction of the dural sac is worsened and symptoms are aggravated during standing or walking. To disclose such positional changes, upright myelography has been widely used. Recently, axial loaded MRI, which can simulate a standing position, has been developed. However, there has been no study to compare the dural sac size between axial loaded MRI and upright myelography. Forty-four patients underwent conventional MRI, axial loaded MRI, and myelography. Transverse and anteroposterior diameters and the cross-sectional areas of the dural sac from L2–L3 to L5–S1 were compared. Pearson correlations of the diameters between the MRIs and the myelograms were analyzed. On the basis of the myelograms, all disc levels were divided into severe and nonsevere constriction groups. In each group, the diameters and the cross-sectional areas were compared. Sensitivity and specificity to detect severe constriction were calculated for the conventional and axial loaded MRI. Transverse and anteroposterior diameters at L4–L5 in the axial loaded MRI and myelogram were significantly smaller than those observed in the conventional MRI (P Conclusion. The axial loaded MRI demonstrated a significant reduction in the dural sac size and significant correlations of the dural sac diameters with the upright myelogram. Furthermore, the axial loaded MRI had higher sensitivity and specificity than the conventional MRI for detecting the severe constriction observed in the myelogram. Therefore, the axial loaded MRI can be used to represent positional changes of the dural sac size detected by the upright myelography in patients with LSCS.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison Between MRI and Myelography in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis for the Decision of Levels of Decompression SurgeryJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2011
- Gait analysis does not correlate with clinical and MR imaging parameters in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosisBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008
- Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with Oswestry Disability Index and MR ImagingEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- Spinal Canal Size and Clinical Symptoms Among Persons Diagnosed With Lumbar Spinal StenosisThe Clinical Journal of Pain, 2007
- Comparison of the Predictive Value of Myelography, Computed Tomography and MRI on the Treadmill Test in Lumbar Spinal StenosisYonsei Medical Journal, 2005
- The Diagnostic Effect From Axial Loading of the Lumbar Spine During Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Degenerative DisordersSpine, 2001
- The Imaging of Lumbar Spinal StenosisClinical Radiology, 2000
- Axial loading of the spine during CT and MR in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis.Acta Radiologica, 1998
- Dynamic Effects on the Lumbar Spinal CanalSpine, 1997
- Lumbar Spinal StenosisSpine, 1995