Severe Sepsis Cohorts Derived From Claims-Based Strategies Appear to be Biased Toward a More Severely Ill Patient Population*
- 1 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 41 (4), 945-953
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827466f1
Abstract
Objective: The epidemiology of severe sepsis is derived from administrative databases that rely on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD–9-CM) codes to select cases. We compared the sensitivity of two code abstraction methods in identifying severe sepsis cases using a severe sepsis registry. Design: Single-center retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary care, Academic, University Hospital. Patients: One thousand seven hundred thirty-five patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Interventions: None. Measurements: Proportion identified as severe sepsis using two code abstraction methods: 1) the new specific ICD-9 codes for severe sepsis and septic shock, and 2) a validated method requiring two ICD-9 codes for infection and end-organ dysfunction. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine sociodemographics and clinical characteristics associated with documentation and coding accuracy. Main Results: The strategy combining a code for infection and end-organ dysfunction was more sensitive in identifying cases than the method requiring specific ICD-9 codes for severe sepsis or septic shock (47% vs. 21%). Elevated serum lactate level (p < 0.001), ICU admission (p < 0.001), presence of shock (p < 0.001), bacteremia as the source of sepsis (p = 0.02), and increased Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (p < 0.001) were independently associated with being appropriately documented and coded. The 28-day mortality was significantly higher in those who were accurately documented/coded (41%, compared with 14% in those who were not, p < 0.001), reflective of a more severe presentation on admission. Conclusions: Patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock were incompletely documented and under-coded, using either ICD-9 code abstracting method. Documentation of subsequent coding of severe sepsis was more common in more severely ill patients. These findings are important when evaluating current national estimates and when interpreting epidemiologic studies of severe sepsis as cohorts derived from claims-based strategies appear to be biased toward a more severely ill patient population.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incident Stroke and Mortality Associated With New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Hospitalized With Severe SepsisJAMA, 2011
- Long-term Cognitive Impairment and Functional Disability Among Survivors of Severe SepsisJAMA, 2010
- Assessment of incidence of severe sepsis in Sweden using different ways of abstracting International Classification of Diseases codes: Difficulties with methods and interpretation of resultsCritical Care Medicine, 2010
- Serum lactate is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of organ failure and shock*Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Racial Variation in the Incidence, Care, and Outcomes of Severe SepsisAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departmentsCritical Care Medicine, 2007
- The Association of Sepsis Syndrome and Organ Dysfunction With Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Suspected InfectionAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions ConferenceCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- Definitions for Sepsis and Organ Failure and Guidelines for the Use of Innovative Therapies in SepsisChest, 1992
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985