What Drives Neonatal Screening Programs?
- 12 September 1991
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 325 (11), 802-804
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199109123251109
Abstract
IN every state in the United States, newborn infants are routinely screened for phenylketonuria and hypothyroidism. In one or more states, screening is routine for at least one of nine other disorders.1 The differences in states' policies on screening can seldom be explained by demographic factors. In states that adopt additional tests, pressure from those concerned about particular diseases has a role, as was the case when screening for phenylketonuria began.2 In states that do not screen for additional diseases, uncertainty about the benefits and risks of tests, competition for scarce health care dollars, and the absence of public pressure . . .Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy of Statewide Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis by Assay of Trypsinogen ConcentrationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Neonatal screening strategy for cystic fibrosis using immunoreactive trypsinogen and direct gene analysis.BMJ, 1991
- Costs and Benefits of Prenatal Screening for Cystic FibrosisMedical Care, 1991
- Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis in Wales and the West Midlands: clinical assessment after five years of screening.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1991
- The Relation between Genotype and Phenotype in Cystic Fibrosis — Analysis of the Most Common Mutation (ΔF508)New England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Access to a Messenger RNA Sequence or Its Protein Product Is Not Limited by Tissue or Species SpecificityScience, 1989
- Newborn Screening Fact SheetsPediatrics, 1989
- REDUCED MORBIDITY IN PATIENTS WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS DETECTED BY NEONATAL SCREENINGThe Lancet, 1985