Abolition of the PRE by instructions in GSR conditioning.
- 1 May 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 69 (5), 476-482
- https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021764
Abstract
Eighty human Ss divided into 2 groups of CRF (continuous reinforcement) and 2 groups of 25% PRF (partial reinforcement) were used in a GSR (galvonic skin response) classical conditioning paradigm to test the discrimination hypothesis as an explanation of the PRE (partial reinforcement effect). Removal of the shock electrodes and instructions as to the onset of extinction was assumed to provide equalization of discriminability between the acquisition and extinction series for 1 PRF and 1 CRF group. A postexperimental inquiry for these Informed groups provided a test of discriminability independent of resistance to extinction. The results demonstrated the presence of the PRE in the Noninformed groups and its abolition in the Informed. The presence of a conditioned GSR during extinction in the Informed groups combined with the abolition of the PRE suggests a 2-component CR (conditioned response) characterized as a simple conditioned CR and a mediated CR.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of GSR fear responses produced by threat and electric shockJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1964
- Effects of instruction on extinction of the conditioned GSR.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963
- Resistance to extinction when partial reinforcement is followed by regular reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- Cognitive factors in heart rate conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- The partial reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- Two tests of the Sheffield hypothesis concerning resistance to extinction, partial reinforcement, and distribution of practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955
- Resistance to extinction of a running response following partial reinforcement under widely spaced trials.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1954