An analysis of the concept of teamwork
- 1 August 1968
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Community Mental Health Journal
- Vol. 4 (4), 326-333
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01435262
Abstract
In community health work, the team approach, is often proposed as one way of getting things done. Yet, when teamwork fails, we are at a loss in assessing the reasons for its failure. In this paper, we suggest an analytic model in viewing the possible reasons of this failure. We examine the structure of the team within the context of six assumptionsunder which teamwork operates: equality, knowledge, professions, marginality, task, and domain. When these assumptions are viewed in relation to possible cognitive dissonance,consisting of functional and substantive rationalities, it is our contention that success or failure in teamwork can best be explained by the degree of dissonance that is inherent in the assumptions.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,2004
- Communication: Problems of interaction between professionals and clientsCommunity Mental Health Journal, 1965
- ANOTHER APPROACH TO PROFESSIONALISM.1965
- Critique of “Profession” as a Sociological CategoryThe Sociological Quarterly, 1963
- The concept of "needs" as related to research.1963
- The hospital researcher walks a tightrope.1959
- A Theory of Cognitive DissonancePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1957
- The Druggists' Dilemma: Problems of a Marginal OccupationAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1956
- A Marginal Professional Role: The ChiropractorSocial Forces, 1952