The Leapfrog Standards: Ready To Jump From Marketplace To Courtroom?
Open Access
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- other
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 22 (2), 46-59
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.46
Abstract
The Leapfrog Group, a consortium of large employers, aims to use its collective purchasing power to motivate hospitals to implement particular measures designed to improve patient safety and the quality of care. While these criteria are meant to be purely aspirational, and while Leapfrog’s effort is praiseworthy, we caution that the articulation of these standards of care may have unintended legal consequences. Efforts by aggressive medical malpractice attorneys could rapidly transform Leapfrog’s standards from marketplace advantages for compliant hospitals to performance expectations required by law. This undesirable potential outcome compounds the importance of selecting these standards with the utmost care.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Of Swords and Shields: The Role of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Medical Malpractice LitigationUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2001
- A Computer-Assisted Management Program for Antibiotics and Other Antiinfective AgentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologistsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study GroupJAMA, 1997
- Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortalityJAMA, 1997
- Evaluating the Message: The Relationship Between Compliance Rate and the Subject of a Practice GuidelineMedical Care, 1994
- Uncovering the High Costs of Teaching HospitalsHealth Affairs, 1986
- A Controlled Trial of the Effect of a Prepaid Group Practice on Use of ServicesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984
- Effects of teaching on hospital costsJournal of Health Economics, 1983
- Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury InstructionsColumbia Law Review, 1979