Diagnostic CT Scans: Assessment of Patient, Physician, and Radiologist Awareness of Radiation Dose and Possible Risks
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 231 (2), 393-398
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2312030767
Abstract
To determine the awareness level concerning radiation dose and possible risks associated with computed tomographic (CT) scans among patients, emergency department (ED) physicians, and radiologists. Adult patients seen in the ED of a U.S. academic medical center during a 2-week period with mild to moderate abdominopelvic or flank pain and who underwent CT were surveyed after acquisition of the CT scan. Patients were asked whether or not they were informed about the risks, benefits, and radiation dose of the CT scan and if they believed that the scan increased their lifetime cancer risk. Patients were also asked to estimate the radiation dose for the CT scan compared with that for one chest radiograph. ED physicians who requested CT scans and radiologists who reviewed the CT scans were surveyed with similar questions and an additional question regarding the number of years in practice. The chi(2) test of independence was used to compare the three respondent groups regarding perceived increased cancer risk from one abdominopelvic CT scan. Seven percent (five of 76) of patients reported that they were told about risks and benefits of their CT scan, while 22% (10 of 45) of ED physicians reported that they had provided such information. Forty-seven percent (18 of 38) of radiologists believed that there was increased cancer risk, whereas only 9% (four of 45) of ED physicians and 3% (two of 76) of patients believed that there was increased risk (chi(2)(2) = 41.45, P <.001). All patients and most ED physicians and radiologists were unable to accurately estimate the dose for one CT scan compared with that for one chest radiograph. Patients are not given information about the risks, benefits, and radiation dose for a CT scan. Patients, ED physicians, and radiologists alike are unable to provide accurate estimates of CT doses regardless of their experience level.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment of intersex needs open discussionBMJ, 2002
- Abdominal CT and the Euratom DirectiveEuropean Radiology, 2002
- Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge?The British Journal of Radiology, 2002
- Radiation Dose ManagementAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CTAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- CT scanning: patterns of use and doseJournal of Radiological Protection, 2000
- Radiation-Related Cancer Risks at Low Doses among Atomic Bomb SurvivorsRadiation Research, 2000
- Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomographyApplied Radiation and Isotopes, 1998
- Spiral CT: how much does radiation dose matter?The Lancet, 1998
- Radiation Risks from Imaging of Intestinal and Abdominal InflammationScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1994