Hypnotic amnesia revisited
- 1 April 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis
- Vol. 22 (2), 167-178
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00207147408412995
Abstract
60 high and 60 low susceptible Ss were randomly assigned (12 groups of 10 Ss each) to 6 experimental procedures which differed in terms of the type of amnesia suggestions given (i.e., pennissively or authoritatively worded amnesia suggestions) and the kind of motivation accompanying the amnesia suggestions (i.e., hypnotic motivation, waking motivation, and waking nonmotivation). Results show that high susceptible Ss performed more effectively in the direction of the amnesia suggestions, but that these suggestions were not totally effective for any of the 12 groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in response either to pennissively or authoritatively worded amnesia suggestions or to hypnotic or waking procedures, but there were differences in response to task-motivating and non-task-motivating procedures (task-motivated Ss were ostensibly more amnesic).Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Amnesia and HypnosisInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1969
- Is the hypnotic trance necessary for performance of hypnotic phenomena?Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1967
- Two types of posthypnotic amnesia: Recall amnesia and source amnesiaInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1966
- Toward a theory of "hypnotic" behavior: Experimental analyses of suggested amnesia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966
- Some characteristics of posthypnotic amnesia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1965
- THE NATURE OF HYPNOSISThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1956