Direct comparison of aspirin plus hirudin aspirin plus heparin, and aspirin alone among 12,000 patients with acute myocardial infarction not receiving thrombolysis: Rationale and design of the First American Study of Infarct Survival (ASIS-1)
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
- Vol. 1 (2), 119-124
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01062568
Abstract
While antithrombotic therapy of acute myocardial infarction is clearly beneficial, substantial controversy exists regarding the optimal regimen. In particular, while aspirin alone has proven highly effective in reducing rates of reinfarction, stroke, and death following acute coronary occlusion, heparin has not clearly been shown to have additional benefit when added to aspirin but is associated with increased rates of hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding. At the same time, available data for newer specific thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin suggest greater benefits than aspirin alone or aspirin plus heparin in terms of maintaining coronary flow, but possibly higher risks of hemorrhagic stroke and major bleeding. Since no completed or ongoing large-scale clinical trial has directly compared aspirin plus hirudin, aspirin plus heparin, and aspirin alone, it is not currently possible to decide which of these three antithrombotic regimens provides the optimal benefit-to-risk ratio. The First American Study of Infarct Survival (ASIS-1) is directly comparing aspirin alone, aspirin plus heparin, and aspirin plus hirudin among 12,000 patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute myocardial infarction who are not felt by their responsible physicians to be appropriate candidates for thrombolytic therapy. Such patients comprise almost two thirds of all U.S. subjects presenting with acute myocardial infarction and are a group at substantial risk of death, reinfarction, and stroke. Thus, the ASIS-1 trial will provide importantly relevant data regarding the optimal antithrombotic regimen for the majority of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. In this manuscript we provide the rationale and design for the First American Study of Infarct Survival (ASIS-1), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial directly comparing aspirin alone, aspirin plus intravenous heparin, and aspirin plus intravenous hirudin in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients not receiving thrombolytic therapy.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the effect of heparin and aspirin versus aspirin alone on transient myocardial ischemia and in-hospital prognosis in patients with unstable anginaJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Indications for fibrinolytic therapy in suspected acute myocardial infarction: collaborative overview of early mortality and major morbidity results from all randomised trials of more than 1000 patientsThe Lancet, 1994
- Hirudin and other thrombin inhibitors experimental results and potential clinical applicationsTrends in Cardiovascular Medicine, 1991
- Clot-bound thrombin is protected from inhibition by heparin-antithrombin III but is susceptible to inactivation by antithrombin III-independent inhibitors.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1990
- Optimal utilization of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: Concepts and controversiesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Biology of Recombinant Hirudin (CGP 39393): A New Prospect in the Treatment of ThrombosisSeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 1989
- Aspirin, Heparin, or Both to Treat Acute Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Evidence Favoring the Use of Anticoagulants in the Hospital Phase of Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Versuche der Blutauswaschung am Lebenden mit Hilfe der DialyseKlinische Wochenschrift, 1925
- Ueber die Einwirkung eines Secretes des officinellen Blutegels auf die Gerinnbarkeit des BlutesNaunyn-Schmiedebergs Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, 1884