The carcinogenicity of smegma: debunking a myth
- 22 August 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Vol. 20 (9), 1046-1054
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01653.x
Abstract
Smegma is widely believed to cause penile, cervical and prostate cancer. This nearly ubiquitous myth continues to permeate the medical literature despite a lack of valid supportive evidence. A historical perspective of medical ideas pertaining to smegma is provided, and the original studies in both animals and humans are reanalysed using the appropriate statistical methods. Evidence supporting the role of smegma as a carcinogen is found wanting. Assertions that smegma is carcinogenic cannot be justified on scientific grounds.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Re: The Detection of Human Papillomavirus Deoxyribonucleic Acid in Intraepithelial, in Situ, Verrucous and Invasive Carcinoma of the PenisJournal of Urology, 1996
- Immunohistochemical localization of IL-1 alpha-, IL-1 beta-, IL-6- and TNF-alpha-like immunoreactivities in human apocrine glandsArchives of Dermatological Research, 1995
- Immunelectron microscopic localization of cathepsin B in human exocrine glandsJournal of Cutaneous Pathology, 1993
- Epidemiological aspects of cancer of the penis in FinlandEuropean Journal Of Cancer Prevention, 1992
- The relationship between circumcision and cancer of the penisCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1991
- In vitro susceptibility of Candida species to lysozymeOral Microbiology and Immunology, 1988
- Preputial Stenosis—Its Site and CorrectionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1980
- SPERM BASIC PROTEINS IN CERVICAL CARCINOGENESISThe Lancet, 1978
- Failure of Sodium Salicylate to Inhibit Hyaluronidase in VitroScience, 1947
- CIRCUMCISION AND PENILE CANCER.The Lancet, 1932