Visual Sensing Is Seeing
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 16 (7), 520-524
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01568.x
Abstract
Faced with the surprising failure to notice large changes to visual scenes (change blindness), many researchers have sought evidence for alternative, nonattentional routes to change detection. A recent article in Psychological Science (Rensink, 2004) proposed a new, nonsensory “mindsight” mechanism to explain the finding that some subjects on some trials reported sensing the presence of a recurring change before they could explicitly identify it and without having a localizable visual experience of change. This mechanism would constitute a previously unknown mode of seeing that, as Rensink suggested, might be akin to a sixth sense. Its existence would have radical implications for the mechanisms underlying conscious visual experience. Provocative claims merit rigorous scrutiny. We rebut the existence of a mindsight mechanism by supporting a more mundane explanation: Some subjects take time to verify their initial conscious detection of changes.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed informationPerception & Psychophysics, 2004
- Visual Sensing Without SeeingPsychological Science, 2004
- Change DetectionAnnual Review of Psychology, 2002
- Visual Search for Change: A Probe into the Nature of Attentional ProcessingVisual Cognition, 2000
- The Dynamic Representation of ScenesVisual Cognition, 2000
- Change blindnessTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 1997
- To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in ScenesPsychological Science, 1997