Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urethral and urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic male patients by the polymerase chain reaction
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 15 (6), 465-471
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01691313
Abstract
To evaluate the commercially available polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay Amplicor (Roche Molecular Systems, USA) for diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis infection, urethral and urine swabs from a total of 344 male patients were tested and the results compared with those obtained by the nonisotopic hybridization assay Pace 2 (Gen Probe, USA) for urethral samples and by the enzyme immunoassay EIA MicroTrak (Syva, USA) for urine. Discrepant results were analyzed by a repeated test run using a major outer membrane protein-derived primer PCR, by the probe competition assay, and by the direct immunofluorescence test (DIF). Thirty-nine men (11.3%) were chlamydia positive, based on the results of all tests from both sampling sites. The rate of detection of chlamydia in urethral specimens by Amplicor and the Pace 2 was 79.5% and 61.5%, respectively, while the rate of detection in urine sediment was 75% for both Amplicor and EIA. In the first run of the PCR, a high number of false-negative results for unfrozen samples was observed, decreasing the sensitivity of Amplicor in urine to 47.3%. The results of the study indicate that Amplicor detects more infected individuals compared with other tests and is suitable as an alternative diagnostic test for chlamydia infections, using not only urethral specimens but also urine specimens. However, the finding of false-negative results when using Amplicor on unfrozen samples must be further investigated.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the Gen-Probe PACE 2 and the Microtrak Enzyme Immunoassay for Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urogenital SamplesSexually Transmitted Diseases, 1994
- Urine and the laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in males.Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1993
- Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in young patients with acute epididymitisEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1992
- The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis infections: Making the best of a bad jobEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1992
- Rapid Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in Male Patients by Antigen Detection in Urine SamplesDermatology, 1992
- Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1991
- Detection of C trachomatis in urogenital specimens by polymerase chain reaction.Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1991
- Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis Antigens in Urine as an Alternative to Swabs and CulturesThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1990
- Culture versus direct specimen test: comparative study of infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in Viennese prostitutes.Sexually Transmitted Infections, 1985
- Culture-Independent Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatisUsing Monoclonal AntibodiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984