Translating Evidence‐Based Falls Prevention into Clinical Practice in Nursing Facilities: Results and Lessons from a Quality Improvement Collaborative
- 7 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Vol. 54 (9), 1414-1418
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00853.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the changes in process of care before and after an evidence‐based fall reduction quality improvement collaborative in nursing facilities. DESIGN: Natural experiment with nonparticipating facilities serving as controls. SETTING: Community nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty‐six participating and 353 nonparticipating nursing facilities in North Carolina. INTERVENTION: Two in‐person learning sessions, monthly teleconferences, and an e‐mail discussion list over 9 months. The change package emphasized screening, labeling, and risk‐factor reduction. MEASUREMENTS: Compliance was measured using facility self‐report and chart abstraction (n=832) before and after the intervention. Fall rates as measured using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) were compared with those of nonparticipating facilities as an exploratory outcome. RESULTS: Self‐reported compliance with screening, labeling, and risk‐factor reduction approached 100%. Chart abstraction revealed only modest improvements in screening (51% to 68%, P<.05), risk‐factor reduction (4% to 7%, P=.30), and medication assessment (2% to 6%, P=.34). There was a significant increase in vitamin D prescriptions (40% to 48%, P=.03) and decrease in sedative‐hypnotics (19% to 12%, P=.04) but no change in benzodiazepine, neuroleptic, or calcium use. No significant changes in proportions of fallers or fall rates were observed according to chart abstraction (28.6% to 37.5%, P=.17), MDS (18.2% to 15.4%, P=.56), or self‐report (6.1–5.6 falls/1,000 bed days, P=.31). CONCLUSON: Multiple‐risk‐factor reduction tasks are infrequently implemented, whereas screening tasks appear more easily modifiable in a real‐world setting. Substantial differences between self‐reported practice and medical record documentation require that additional data sources be used to assess the change‐in‐care processes resulting from quality improvement programs. Interventions to improve interdisciplinary collaboration need to be developed.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Falls Documentation in Nursing Homes: Agreement Between the Minimum Data Set and Chart Abstractions of Medical and Nursing DocumentationJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2005
- Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and RecommendationsThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004
- Testing the Feasibility of Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Long-Term Care FacilitiesJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2004
- Fall and Injury Prevention in Residential Care—Effects in Residents with Higher and Lower Levels of CognitionJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2003
- Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Intervention on Falls in Nursing Home ResidentsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2003
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fall Prevention Strategies in Old Peoples’ HomesGerontology, 2000
- A Framework for Collaborative ImprovementQuality Management in Health Care, 1998
- An Epidemiologic Study of Fall‐Related Fractures Among Institutionalized Older PeopleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1995
- Fall Frequency and Characteristics and the Risk of Hip FracturesJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1994
- A Randomized Trial of Quality Assurance in Nursing HomesMedical Care, 1988