The Ethics of Research Using Biobanks
Open Access
- 10 January 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 165 (1), 97-100
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.1.97
Abstract
The last decade has seen growing ethical concern about the use of stored human tissue for research, particularly with respect to population-based genetic research.1-4 In 1999, it was reported that Medical Biobank in Västerbotten County in Sweden and a biotech company, UmanGenomics, Umeå, which had been given all commercial rights to the biobank, had developed an ethics policy basically solving the problems with this type of research.5,6 The key element in this policy was informed consent, and all donors were reported to have signed a consent form. International bioethical debate has also centered on the use of informed consent in tissue-based research, usually founded on the assumption that consent procedures are the most important issue from the donors’ point of view.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Iceland Inc.”?: On the ethics of commercial population genomicsSocial Science & Medicine, 2004
- Why surgical patients do not donate tissue for commercial research: review of recordsBMJ, 2003
- Conflicting Notions of Personhood in Genetic ResearchAnthropology Today, 2002
- Informed consent for genetic research on blood stored for more than a decade: a population based studyBMJ, 2002
- For and against: No consent should be needed for using leftover body material for scientific purposes * For * AgainstBMJ, 2002
- The Debate Over Research on Stored Biological SamplesArchives of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Informed Consent and Other Ethical Issues in Human Population GeneticsAnnual Review of Genetics, 2001
- Informed Consent for Population-Based Research Involving GeneticsJAMA, 2001
- Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional surveyThe Lancet, 2001
- Ownership and uses of human tissue: Does the Nuffield bioethics report accord with opinion of surgical inpatients?BMJ, 1996