Citation rates and impact factors: should they matter?
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 74 (877), 1-3
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.74.877.740001
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rationing debate: Defining a package of healthcare services the NHS is responsible for The case forBMJ, 1997
- Journal accused of manipulating impact factorBMJ, 1997
- A critical analysis of the journal impact factors ofAngewandte Chemie and the journal of the American Chemical Society inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations onlyScientometrics, 1996
- Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?BMJ, 1996
- Impact factors can misleadNature, 1996
- Journal impact factorsNature, 1995
- The skewness of scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992
- National citationsNature, 1990
- How research becomes knowledge in radiology: an analysis of citations to published papersAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1988
- Citation Indexes for ScienceScience, 1955