Reamed Versus Nonreamed Intramedullary Nailing of Lower Extremity Long Bone Fractures: A Systematic Overview and Meta-analysis
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
- Vol. 14 (1), 2-9
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200001000-00002
Abstract
To determine the effect of reamed versus nonreamed intramedullary (IM) nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures on the rates of nonunion, implant failure, malunion, compartment syndrome, pulmonary embolus, and infection. Quantitative systematic review of prospective, randomized controlled trials. MEDLINE and SCISEARCH computer searches provided lists of published randomized clinical trials from 1969 to 1998. Extensive hand searches of major orthopaedic journals, bibliographies of major orthopaedic texts, and personal files identified additional studies. Of 676 citations initially identified, sixty proved potentially eligible, of which four published and five unpublished randomized trials met all eligibility criteria. Each of three investigators assessed study quality and abstracted relevant data. The pooled relative risk of reamed versus nonreamed nails (nine trials, n = 646 patients) was 0.33 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16 to 0.68; p = 0.004]. The absolute risk difference in nonunion rates with reamed IM nailing was 7.0 percent (95% CI, 1 to 11 percent). Thus, one nonunion could be prevented for every fourteen patients treated with reamed IM nailing [number needed to treat (NNT) = 14.28]. The risk ratios for secondary outcome measures were: implant failure, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.58; p < 0.001); malunion, 1.06 (95% CI, 0.32 to 3.57); pulmonary embolus, 1.10 (95% CI, 0.26 to 4.76); compartment syndrome, 0.45 (95% CI, 0.13 to 1.56); and infection, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.21 to 4.76). Sensitivity analyses suggested that reported rates of nonunion and implant failure were higher in studies of lower quality. The type of long bone fractured (tibia or femur), the degree of soft tissue injury (open or closed), study quality, and whether a study was published or unpublished did not significantly alter the relative risk of nonunion between reamed and nonreamed IM nailing. There is evidence from a pooled analysis of randomized trials that reamed IM nailing of lower extremity long bone fractures significantly reduces rates of nonunion and implant failure in comparison with nonreamed nailing.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Treatment of Femoral Shaft Fractures Using Intramedullary Interlocked Nails with and without Intramedullary Reaming: A Preliminary ReportJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1997
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- The Treatment of Open Tibial Shaft Fractures Using an Interlocked Intramedullary Nail Without ReamingJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1994
- Prospective Study of Union Rate of Open Tibial Fractures Treated with Locked, Unreamed Intramedullary NailsJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1994
- Successful Use of Reaming and Intramedullary Nailing of the TibiaJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 1990
- An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of TreatmentNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The Role of Intramedullary Fixation in Open FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1986
- The Effects of Reaming and Intramedullary Nailing on Fracture HealingPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1986
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986