Physician Response to Patient Insurance Status in Ambulatory Care Clinical Decision-Making
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 34 (8), 783-797
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199608000-00006
Abstract
Individuals without health insurance in general receive fewer health services and are more likely than insured patients to experience poor outcomes. The main goal of this research was to study whether physicians' clinical recommendations vary for insured and uninsured patients, implying that physicians' choices of care may mediate insurance-related differences in health care use. The authors designed clinical scenarios that describe routine decisions encountered by primary care physicians in ambulatory settings. Scenarios were designed to include discretionary, nondiscretionary, preventive, and diagnostic/therapeutic services. Insurance status of patients was indicated as either insured or uninsured for the service under consideration. Scenarios were presented to a nationally representative sample of primary care physicians (n = 1182) as part of the American Medical Association 1992 Socio-economic Monitoring System Survey. Physicians were assigned randomly to receive eight scenarios in which patients were either insured or uninsured. For each scenario, physicians were asked to indicate the percentage of patients for whom they would recommend a given service. After controlling for variables associated with nonresponse, we found that physicians who were presented scenarios with insured patients recommended service for 72% of patients, and physicians who were presented scenarios with uninsured patients recommended the same services for 67% of patients (P < 0.001). Physicians recommended both discretionary services (50% versus 42%; P < 0.001) and nondiscretionary services more often for insured than uninsured patients (93% versus 91%; P < 0.05). In self-reports, physicians are more likely to recommend services for insured than for uninsured patients, and more so when services are discretionary. This provides evidence that physicians' recommendations may be important mediators of insurance-related variation in the use of health-care services. Higher rates of use among the insured may not always reflect higher quality of care, particularly when the service is discretionary in nature.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed Access to Health Care: Risk Factors, Reasons, and ConsequencesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Comparison of uninsured and privately insured hospital patients. Condition on admission, resource use, and outcomePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- The association of payer with utilization of cardiac procedures in MassachusettsJAMA, 1990
- Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.American Journal of Public Health, 1990
- The impact of Medicaid on physician use by low-income children.American Journal of Public Health, 1989
- Evaluating health-care needs of the poor: A community-oriented approachThe American Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Case mix and resource utilization by uninsured hospital patients in the Boston metropolitan areaJAMA, 1989
- Inequities in Health Services among Insured AmericansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Reverse targeting of preventive care due to lack of health insurancePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Americans Report On Their Access To Health CareHealth Affairs, 1987