Sick individuals and sick populations: 20 years later
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 60 (5), 396-398
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.042770
Abstract
Twenty years after Geoffrey Rose published his classic paper, the central messages remain highly relevant to modern public health policy and practice. The individual and population approaches are fundamentally different but both are needed. Recent examples of powerful population approaches prove Rose's point that norms can change benefiting the most deprived. Individual approaches have also succeeded but their protection of the most deprived communities is limited. Consumerism in health and over-reliance on individual approaches risk widening health inequalities.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- C-reactive protein in 2005. Interview by Peter C. Block.2005
- A national strategy for smoking cessation treatment in EnglandAddiction, 2005
- Feeling bad about immunising our childrenVaccine, 2005
- Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public healthInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- Framingham risk score and prediction of lifetime risk for coronary heart diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2004
- Measuring and Monitoring Success in Compressing MorbidityAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Social inclusion and the public health: the case for partnerships.New South Wales Public Health Bulletin, 2002
- Social Capital, Disorganized Communities, and the Third Way: Understanding the Retreat from Structural Inequalities in Epidemiology and Public HealthInternational Journal of Health Services, 2001
- Chronic disability trends in elderly United States populations: 1982–1994Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1997
- Social inequalities in health: Next questions and converging evidenceSocial Science & Medicine, 1997