Abdominal Obesity and the Risk of Esophageal and Gastric Cardia Carcinomas
Open Access
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 17 (2), 352-358
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-0748
Abstract
Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma is rapidly increasing in incidence. Body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor, but its distribution does not reflect the demographic distribution of the cancer (which is highest among White men). Abdominal obesity patterns may explain this discordance, but no studies exist to date. Methods: Nested case-control study within 206,974 members of the Kaiser Permanente multiphasic health checkup cohort; subjects received detailed questionnaires, a standardized examination including BMI and anthropometric measurements, and follow-up of esophageal and cardia cancers using registry data. Results: 101 incident esophageal adenocarcinomas, 105 cardia adenocarcinomas, and 144 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas were detected (BMI data available for all cases; abdominal measurements for a subset). Increasing abdominal diameter was strongly associated with an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma [odds ratio (OR), 3.47; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.29-9.33; abdominal diameter, ≥25 versus <20 cm]. Adjustment for BMI did not diminish this association (BMI-adjusted OR, 4.78; 95% CI, 1.14-20.11). The association was also not diminished by adjustment for gastroesophageal reflux-type symptoms, although reflux-type symptoms were separately associated with both abdominal diameter and cancer risk. Abdominal diameter was not associated with the risk of cardia adenocarcinomas (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.38-4.25; diameter, ≥25 versus <20 cm) or esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.32-1.92). Conclusions: Increasing abdominal diameter was associated with an increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, independent of BMI. Cancer risk was not substantially mediated through gastroesophageal reflux-type symptoms, although symptoms may imperfectly measure reflux severity. Given abdominal obesity is more common among males, these findings suggest that increases in obesity may disproportionately increase the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in males. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(2):352–8)Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abdominal obesity, ethnicity and gastro-oesophageal reflux symptomsGut, 2007
- Adiponectin mediates antiproliferative and apoptotic responses in human MCF7 breast cancer cellsBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2006
- Body size and composition and the risk of gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinomaInternational Journal of Cancer, 2006
- Anthropometric correlates of intragastric pressureScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006
- Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysisThe Lancet, 2004
- Leptin promotes invasiveness of kidney and colonic epithelial cells via phosphoinositide 3‐kinase‐, Rho‐, and Rac‐dependent signaling pathwaysThe FASEB Journal, 2000
- Hospitalization for congestive heart failure. Explaining racial differencesJAMA, 1995
- The Pathophysiology of Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease: An OverviewScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1995
- 1. Methods and populationPreventive Medicine, 1973
- Reliability of a self-administered medical questionnaireArchives of Internal Medicine, 1969