Limitations in equivalence of alternate subtests for Russell's revision of the wechsler memory scale: Causes and solutions
- 1 May 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Vol. 6 (2), 220-223
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638408401211
Abstract
Reasons for limited equivalence of Form II of the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-II) Figural Memory Subtest as an alternate form for the Russell's Revision of the Wechsler Memory Scale (RWMS) Figural Memory Subtest were investigated. Thirty college students rated figural stimuli from RWMS and WMS-II on dimensions related to memory. Raters judged figural stimuli from RWMS to be less memorable, more complex, and more difficult to label verbally. Forms can be made more equivalent by either changes in scoring or the interchanging of stimuli across forms.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Equivalence of alternate subtests for the russell revision of the wechsler memory scaleJournal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1984
- Alternate-form reliability, and age-related scores for Russell's Revised Wechsler Memory Scale.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980
- A multiple scoring method for the assessment of complex memory functions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975
- Decision processes in memory.Psychological Review, 1967
- Cerebral Organization and BehaviorScience, 1961