Evaluation of an automated culture systemfor detecting bacterial contamination of platelets: an analysis with 15 contaminating organisms
- 21 April 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Transfusion
- Vol. 41 (4), 477-482
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41040477.x
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 1 in 2000 platelet components are bacterially contaminated. The time to detection of 15 seeded organisms in platelets recovered from an automated culture system was studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Isolates of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Candida albicans, Clostridium perfringens, Corynebacterium species, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Propionibacterium acnes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Serratia marcescens, Streptococcus pyogenes, and Streptococcus viridans were inoculated into Day 2 apheresis platelet components to obtain a final concentration of approximately 10 and 100 CFU per mL (2 units/organism). Each bag was sampled 10 times (20 mL/sample). Four mL of each sample was inoculated into standard aerobic and anaerobic bottles and into aerobic and anaerobic bottles containing charcoal; 2 mL was inoculated into pediatric aerobic bottles (so as to maintain a 1:10 ratio of sample to media) and 1 mL into thioglycollate broth. RESULTS: With the exception of P. acnes, all organisms were detected in a mean of 9.2 to 25.6 hours. A range of 10 serial dilutions in inoculating concentrations was associated with an overall 10.1-percent difference in detection time. A mean of 74.4 and 86.2 hours (100 and 10 CFU/mL inocula, respectively) was required for the detection of P. acnes in anaerobic bottles. CONCLUSION: Bacteria thought to be clinically significant platelet contaminants can be detected in 9.2 to 25.6 hours when the starting concentration is approximately 10 to 100 CFU per mL. P. acnes required considerably longer incubation times for detection (in either aerobic or anaerobic bottles). However, P. acnes is of questionable clinical significance. Such a detection system could be used in either a blood collection center or a transfusion service to screen platelet concentrates for bacterial contamination. Such testing (with sterile sampling performed so as to maintain a closed-bag system) would be expected to save lives and might allow an extension of platelet storage.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Approaches to the detection of bacterial contamination in cellular blood productsTransfusion Medicine Reviews, 1999
- Platelet bacterial contamination and the use of a chemiluminescence‐ linked universal bacterial ribosomal RNA gene probeTransfusion, 1994
- A prospective microbiologic surveillance program to detect and prevent the transfusion of bacterially contaminated plateletsTransfusion, 1993
- The use of a chemiluminescence‐linked universal bacterial ribosomal RNA gene probe and blood gas analysis for the rapid detection of bacterial contamination in white cell‐reduced and nonreduced plateletsTransfusion, 1993
- Extension of platelet concentrate storage to 7 days in second‐ generation bagsTransfusion, 1987
- Bacterial proliferation in platelet concentratesTransfusion, 1986
- Escherichia coli sepsis from contaminated platelet transfusionArchives of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Paired comparison of the in vivo and in vitro results of storage of platelet concentrates in two containersTransfusion, 1984
- Extension of platelet concentrate storageTransfusion, 1983
- Bacteriocidal Properties of Platelet ConcentratesTransfusion, 1974