Is Competition Bad?
- 24 November 1983
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 309 (21), 1315-1319
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198311243092111
Abstract
Thoughtful observers worry these days that the competitive model commercial interests are introducing into medical care will compromise the quality of care that has been upheld by the medical profession during this century.1 , 2 Yet the relations between quality and the underlying paradigms of competition and profession have not been carefully examined.The fundamental nature of a profession is indicated by the original meaning of the word: a vow — solemn, altruistic, and honorable — made upon entering a religious order.3 It took 300 years for this 13th-century meaning to broaden to include a vocation of professed knowledge, as in Bacon's . . .Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The New Health Professionals: Three ExamplesAnnual Review of Public Health, 1982
- Applying antitrust laws to the professions: Implications for psychology.American Psychologist, 1982
- Physicians and nurse practitioners: do they provide equivalent health care?American Journal of Public Health, 1982
- Competition Policy and the Medical ProfessionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Status and Status Strain in the ProfessionsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- The New Medical-Industrial ComplexNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Antitrust Enforcement in the Medical Services Industry: What Does It All Mean?The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society, 1980
- Competition in the Delivery of Medical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Reproducibility of Clinical Data and Decisions in the Management of Upper Respiratory IllnessesMedical Care, 1979
- Use of Allied Health Professionals in Internists' OfficesArchives of Internal Medicine, 1971