‘New’ and ‘old’ antidepressants: All equal in the eyes of the lore?
- 1 August 2001
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 179 (2), 95-96
- https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.179.2.95
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing the Comparative Effectiveness of Antidepressant TherapiesThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 2001
- Classifying Depression: Should Paradigms Lost Be Regained?American Journal of Psychiatry, 2000
- A Systematic Review of Newer Pharmacotherapies for Depression in Adults: Evidence Report Summary: Clinical Guideline, Part 2Annals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerabilityJournal of Affective Disorders, 2000
- Are the Newer Antidepressant Drugs as Effective as Established Physical Treatments? Results from an Australasian Clinical Panel ReviewAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
- Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor efficacy in severe and melancholic depressionJournal of Psychopharmacology, 1998
- Pharmacotherapy for major depression with melancholic features: relative efficacy of tricyclic versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressantsJournal of Affective Disorders, 1996
- Comparative efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclics in the treatment of melancholiaAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1994
- Paroxetine: A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor showing better tolerance, but weaker antidepressant effect than clomipramine in a controlled multicenter studyJournal of Affective Disorders, 1990