Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Cardiac Surgery: Indications and Long‐Term Follow‐Up
Open Access
- 23 December 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 32 (1), 7-12
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02170.x
Abstract
Conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation after heart surgery occur in about 1.5% of patients. Early pacemaker implantation may reduce morbidity and postoperative hospital stay. We reviewed our experience with patients undergoing surgery to try and identify predictors for pacemaker requirements and patients who will remain pacemaker dependent. We performed a retrospective review of 4,999 patients undergoing surgery between the years 1993 and 2005. Patient age was 64 +/- 12 years, and 71% were males. Coronary bypass was performed in 4,071 (81%), aortic valve replacement in 675 (14%), and mitral valve replacement in 968 (18%) patients. Seventy-two patients (1.4%) required implantation of a permanent pacemaker after surgery. Indications for pacemaker implantation included complete atrioventricular block in 59, symptomatic bradycardia/slow atrial fibrillation in nine, second-degree atrioventricular block in two, and other conduction disturbances in two patients. Predictors for pacemaker requirement by multivariate analysis were left bundle branch block and aortic valve replacement (P < 0.001). Late follow-up was available in 58 patients, at 72 +/- 32 months. Thirty-seven (63%) were pacemaker dependent. Predictors for late pacemaker dependency were third-degree atrioventricular block after surgery and preoperative left bundle branch block (P < 0.001). Patients at high risk for pacemaker implantation after heart surgery include those with preexisting conduction disturbances, and those undergoing aortic valve replacement. Of those receiving a pacemaker, about one-third will recover at late follow-up. For patients in the high-risk group who are pacemaker dependent after surgery, we recommend implanting a permanent pacemaker at 5 days after surgery, thus enabling early mobilization and early discharge.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence and pathophysiology of atrioventricular block following mitral valve replacement and ring annuloplastyEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement: Incidence, Indications, and PredictorsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Determinants of Pacemaker Dependency After Coronary and/or Mitral or Aortic Valve Surgery With Long-Term Follow-UpThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2008
- Risk Factors for Requirement of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Aortic Valve ReplacementJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 2006
- Coronary pathology predicts conduction disturbances after coronary artery bypass graftingThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1991
- Postoperative conduction disturbances: A comparison of blood and crystalloid cardioplegiaThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- Frequency and significance of complete atrioventricular block after coronary artery bypass graftingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Natural History and Determinants of Conduction Defects Following Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1987
- Permanent Cardiac Pacing After Open‐heart Surgery: Acquired Heart DiseasePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1984