A multicentric survey of the practice of hand hygiene in haemodialysis units: factors affecting compliance
Open Access
- 15 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
- Vol. 20 (6), 1164-1171
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh759
Abstract
Background. This study intended to investigate the degree of compliance with hand hygiene and use of gloves by health workers in haemodialysis (HD) units, and the factors that influenced adherence to hand hygiene protocols. Methods. During the month of November 2003, one person observed the health care staff in each of nine different dialysis units, during 495 randomly distributed 30 min observation periods that covered all steps of a haemodialysis session (connection, dialysis and disconnection). The observers noted the number of potential opportunities to implement standard precautions and the number of occasions on which the precautions were actually taken. Adherence to standard precautions was evaluated, analysing the influence of the following variables: the patient-to-nurse ratio, the number of HD shifts scheduled per day, acute HD units vs chronic, whether or not infectious patients were isolated and in-house vs contract cleaning personnel. Results. There were a total of 977 opportunities to wear gloves for, and to wash the hands following, a patient-oriented activity, and 1902 opportunities to wash hands before such an activity. Gloves were actually used on 92.9% of these occasions. Hands were washed only 35.6% of the time after patient contact, and only 13.8% of the time before patient contact. Poor adherence to hand washing was associated with the number of shifts per HD unit per day and with higher patient-to-nurse ratios. In the acute HD units, there was greater adherence to standard precautions than in the chronic units, although there too it was substandard. The personnel's knowledge of patients’ infectious status did not modify their adherence to hand hygiene practices. A higher patient-to-nurse ratio independently influenced hand washing both before and after patient contact. Conclusions. The overall adherence of health care workers to recommended hand washing practices is low. Whether or not programmes promoting higher hand hygiene standards and the potential use of alcohol-based hand cleansers will improve hand hygiene practices in HD units requires further investigation.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marked reduction in the prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients: causes and consequencesAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2004
- The changing epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in haemodialysis: European multicentre studyNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2004
- Decrease in the hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence in hemodialysis patients in Spain: effect of time, initiating HCV prevalence studies and adoption of isolation measures.Antiviral Research, 2003
- Prevalence of infected patients and understaffing have a rolein hepatitis C virus transmission in dialysisAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2001
- Audit on the degree of application of universal precautions in a haemodialysis unitNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1999
- Standard precautions in haemodialysis - the gap between theory and practiceNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 1999
- Compliance with Handwashing in a Teaching HospitalAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- No Time for Handwashing!? Handwashing versus Alcoholic Rub: Can We Afford 100% Compliance?Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1997
- Clinical Outcomes after Transfusion-Associated Hepatitis CNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Incidence and risk factors for hepatitis C seroconversion in hemodialysis: A prospective studyKidney International, 1993