Detection of MET Gene Copy Number in Cancer Samples Using the Droplet Digital PCR Method
Open Access
- 14 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 11 (1), e0146784
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146784
Abstract
The analysis of MET gene copy number (CN) has been considered to be a potential biomarker to predict the response to MET-targeted therapies in various cancers. However, the current standard methods to determine MET CN are SNP 6.0 in the genomic DNA of cancer cell lines and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in tumor models, respectively, which are costly and require advanced technical skills and result in relatively subjective judgments. Therefore, we employed a novel method, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), to determine the MET gene copy number with high accuracy and precision. The genomic DNA of cancer cell lines or tumor models were tested and compared with the MET gene CN and MET/CEN-7 ratio determined by SNP 6.0 and FISH, respectively. In cell lines, the linear association of the MET CN detected by ddPCR and SNP 6.0 is strong (Pearson correlation = 0.867). In tumor models, the MET CN detected by ddPCR was significantly different between the MET gene amplification and non-amplification groups according to FISH (mean: 15.4 vs 2.1; P = 0.044). Given that MET gene amplification is defined as MET CN >5.5 by ddPCR, the concordance rate between ddPCR and FISH was 98.0%, and Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.760 (95% CI, 0.498–1.000; P MET gene copy number with high precision and accuracy as compared with the results from SNP 6.0 and FISH in cancer cell lines and tumor samples, respectively.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- HER2, MET and FGFR2 oncogenic driver alterations define distinct molecular segments for targeted therapies in gastric carcinomaBritish Journal of Cancer, 2014
- MET amplification is not rare and predicts unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer after chemotherapyCancer, 2013
- MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcomeBritish Journal of Cancer, 2012
- High-Throughput Droplet Digital PCR System for Absolute Quantitation of DNA Copy NumberAnalytical Chemistry, 2011
- MET signalling: principles and functions in development, organ regeneration and cancerNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2010
- Amplification of MET may identify a subset of cancers with extreme sensitivity to the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor PHA-665752Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Activation of c‐Met (hepatocyte growth factor receptor) in human gastric cancer tissueCancer Science, 2004
- Met, metastasis, motility and moreNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2003
- Role of the hepatocyte growth factor receptor, c-Met, in oncogenesis and potential for therapeutic inhibitionCytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, 2001
- Somatic mutations in the kinase domain of the Met/hepatocyte growth factor receptor gene in childhood hepatocellular carcinomas.1999