The Implications of Cognitive Style for the Management of Student‐Supervisor Relationships
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Psychology
- Vol. 17 (1-2), 209-217
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170116
Abstract
There has been little research into thesis supervision despite numerous testimonies asserting its critical importance in higher education. From the studies which have been carried out, it is evident that there are two main issues contributing to student dissatisfaction and low completion rates. One is the feeling of isolation expressed by students. The second, and most widely reported, is the nature of the relationship between supervisor and student. This paper describes an innovative programme of supervision which helps resolve the first of these issues. It also reports a preliminary study into the allocation of students to supervisors on the basis of the cognitive styles of both parties. Although, at this stage, there is no clear-cut evidence to demonstrate the benefits of a 'matching' approach, it is suggested that a focus on the interaction between student and supervisor, using qualitative methods, rather than on the individuals themselves, may prove fruitfulKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition‐Analysis For Organizational ResearchJournal of Management Studies, 1996
- Thesis supervision in the social sciences: Managed or negotiated?Higher Education, 1994
- Cognitive Style and its Relevance for Management PracticeBritish Journal of Management, 1994
- Tales of the Unexpected: supervisors’ and students’ perspectives on short‐term projects and dissertationsEducational Studies, 1992
- The social science PhD: A literature reviewStudies in Higher Education, 1991
- Research Supervision: the value of collegialityCambridge Journal of Education, 1989
- Cognitive Styles: an integrated modelEducational Psychology, 1987
- The Development and Current Dilemmas of Postgraduate EducationEuropean Journal of Education, 1986
- The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practiceEducational Psychologist, 1984
- Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976