Abstract
The present experiments compare the pojections to the inferior olive of the cat from the gracile, cuneate and spinal trigeminal nuclei. A differential labeling strategy was used for these comparisons. It was found that all three somatic sensory nuclei project to portions of all three major divisions of the contralateral inferior olive. The spinal trigeminal n. may also project less densely to the ipsilateral medial accessory olive. Projections to the dorsal accessory nucleus (DAO) and the medially‐adjacent ventral lamella of the principal nucleus are roughly somatotopically organized. Although there is considerable overlap between the projections predominantly to medial DAO, and the spinal trigeminal nucleus pars caudalis projects predominantly to the most medial portions of DAO and the ventral lamella of principal olive. Projections to the medial accessory olive, on the other hand, are not as highly organized. Instead, they overlap extensively within a small eggshaped area in the middle of the caudal half of the nucleus. Whereas all portions of the gracile and cuneate nuclei project to the inferior olive, only the pars caudalis of the spinal trigeminal nucleus appears to do so. These results were compared with the three available olivocerebellar maps as well as with the available behavioral and electrophysiological evidence on cerebellar somatotopic organization. This comparison indicated that the inputs to the cerebellum from the three second‐order somatosensory nuclei via the inferior olive appear to be generally consistent with cerebellar somatotopic organization. This consistency is apparent not only with respect to the longitudinally‐organized, vermal and paravermal differences in the anterior lobe, but also with respect to the transversely‐organized specific somatotopy of the intermediate zone of the anterior lobe and the paramedian lobule.