Abstract
The validity and practical usefulness of the Bowman-Jellinek classification schedule was tested on a sample of 276 incarcerated abnormal drinkers. The largest categories differentiated by the schedule were (1) stupid drinkers, 43.8%, (2) discordant drinkers, 15.6%, and (3) compensating drinkers, 6.5%. Other categories contributed 4.7 to 0.4% to the total sample, and 6.9% could not be classified. Statistical descriptions of the large categories indicate considerable homogeneity with reference to several factors such as age, race, nativity, intelligence and marital status. Illustrative case histories are presented of all categories of which instances were found in the sample. It is concluded that the Bowman-Jellinek classification schedule is a useful instrument for scientific prediction and control with respect to abnormal drinkers. The need for increased mental-hygiene facilities, particularly for the establishment of publicly supported clinics in metropolitan centers, is indicated. It is also suggested that the type of treatment furnished inebriates in the Detroit House of Correction apparently tends to ameliorate their condition.
Keywords