The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis
Open Access
- 12 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 99 (4), 786-793
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.06689.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To design new models that combine clinical variables and biopsy data with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) data, and assess their value in predicting the probability of insignificant prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 220 patients (cT stage T1c or T2a, prostate‐specific antigen level 3 with no poorly differentiated elements. The accuracy of predicting insignificant prostate cancer was assessed using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), for previously reported clinical models and for newly generated MR models combining clinical variables, and biopsy data with MRI data (MRI model) and MRI/MRSI data (MRI/MRSI model). RESULTS At pathology, 41% of patients had insignificant cancer; both MRI (AUC 0.803) and MRI/MRSI (AUC 0.854) models incorporating clinical, biopsy and MR data performed significantly better than the basic (AUC 0.574) and more comprehensive medium (AUC 0.726) clinical models. The P values for the differences between the models were: base vs medium model, <0.001; base vs MRI model, <0.001; base vs MRI/MRSI model, <0.001; medium vs MRI model, <0.018; medium vs MRI/MRSI model, <0.001. CONCLUSIONS The new MRI and MRI/MRSI models performed better than the clinical models for predicting the probability of insignificant prostate cancer. After appropriate validation, the new MRI and MRI/MRSI models might help in counselling patients who are considering choosing deferred therapy.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- COMPARISON OF ENDORECTAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY AND DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION IN THE PREOPERATIVE ANATOMICAL LOCALIZATION OF PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2005
- Expectant management: an option for localized prostate cancerProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2005
- Optimal timing for in vivo 1H‐MR spectroscopic imaging of the human prostate at 3TMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005
- Sequence design for magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer at 3 TMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005
- Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Effect of Prior Transrectal Biopsy on Endorectal MRI and MR Spectroscopic ImagingAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomyCancer, 2004
- AN ANALYSIS OF MEN WITH CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER WHO DEFERRED DEFINITIVE THERAPYJournal of Urology, 2004
- RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SYSTEMATIC BIOPSIES AND HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES OF 222 RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS: LACK OF PREDICTION OF TUMOR SIGNIFICANCE FOR MEN WITH NONPALPABLE PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2001
- Impalpable Invisible Stage T1c Prostate Cancer: Characteristics and Clinical Relevance in 100 Radical Prostatectomy Specimens-A Different ViewJournal of Urology, 1997
- Prospective characterization of pathological features of Prostatic Carcinomas Detected Via Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Based ScreeningJournal of Urology, 1996