Determinants of ejection performance in aortic stenosis.
- 1 July 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 64 (1), 126-134
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.64.1.126
Abstract
The cause of reduced ejection performance in patients with aortic stenosis is controversial. The relative contribution of afterload and contractility was evaluated in 76 patients with pure or predominant valvular aortic stenosis studied by left ventricular micromanometry and quantitative cineangiography. Thirteen patients without detectable heart disease served as controls. The ejection performance was assessed in terms of the mean normalized systolic ejection rate (MNSER, normal .gtoreq. 2.0 end-diastolic volumes (EV)/s), contractility by total pressure Vmax (normal .gtoreq. 1.47 muscle lengths/s) and/or peak measured velocity of shortening (normal .gtoreq. 1.14 muscle lengths/s) and afterload by peak systolic circumferential wall stress (normal < 460 dyn .cntdot. 103/cm2). The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the level of isovolumic contractility and peak systolic wall stress. In group 1, contractility and wall stress were normal. In group 2, contractility was normal and wall stress was increased. Wall stress was normal in group 3 and increased in group 4; in both groups, the isovolumic contractile indexes were depressed. At normal (groups 1 and 3) or increased (groups 2 and 4) wall stress, MNSER was significantly (P < 0.01) smaller in patients with reduced isovolumic contractility (1.72 EDV/s in group 3 and 1.48 EDV/s in group 4) than in the corresponding groups with normal contractility (2.34 EDV/s in group 1 and 2.13 EDV/s in group 2). Conversely, with a normal (control group and groups 1 and 2) or depressed (groups 3 and 4) contractile state, there was a significant inverse linear relationship between MNSER and systolic wall stress. The slopes of the 2 curves were almost identical, but the intercept on the y-axis (MNSER) was significantly (P < 0.001) smaller in patients with depressed contractility (3.09 EDV/s) than in those with normal contractility (2.59 EDV/s). Both altered contractility and increased afterload are operative in depressing left ventricular ejection performance. The observation that contractile state can be normal or impaired at normal and increased systolic wall stress is evidence for nonuniform myocardial quality in adequate and inadequate hypertrophy. The significantly higher left ventricular angiographic muscle mass in groups 3 and 4 than in groups 1 and 2 is consistent with the concept that whether or not hypertrophy is adequate or inadequate in terms of maintaining normal systolic stress, advanced myocardial hypertrophy leads to depression of contractility.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Left ventricular radius to wall thickness ratioThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979
- Influence of preoperative left ventricular function on results of homograft replacement of the aortic valve for aortic stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979
- Pre- and postoperative left ventricular contractile function in patients with aortic valve disease.Heart, 1979
- Analysis of wall dynamics and directional components of left ventricular contraction in manThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1976
- Determinants of Cardiac Performance in Severe Aortic StenosisChest, 1976
- High-fidelity left ventricular pressure measurements for the assessment of cardiac contractility in manThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1973
- Assessment of myocardial contractility in children and young adults from ventricular pressure recordingsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1971
- Quantification of the contractile state of the intact human heart: Maximal velocity of contractile element shortening determined by the instantaneous relation between the rate of pressure rise and pressure in the left ventricle during isovolumic systoleThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1970
- Wall stress in the normal and hypertrophied human left ventricleThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1968
- Usefulness and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volumeThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1966